3 Ocak 2013 Perşembe

Poll Watch: Purple Strategies 2016 Presidential Survey

To contact us Click HERE
Purple Strategies 2016 Presidential Poll
  • Hillary Clinton (D) 53%
  • Paul Ryan (R) 36%
  • Not sure 11%
Survey of 1,000 likely voters was conducted December 8-10, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 3.1 percentage points. Party ID: 40% Democrat; 30% Republican; 29% Independent. 

Inside the numbers: 
Hillary Clinton's lead includes a 9-point edge among men,whom President Obama lost nationally by 7 points,and an 11-point edge among voters withouta college degree, whom Obama won by just4 points nationally.
Clinton’s lead among independents is thesame as her overall lead, 53% to 36%, astrong showing at this early stage. However,Clinton is by no means a consensus candidate.She wins just 8% of Republican voters,while Obama won 6% of the Republicanvote nationwide.

Poll Watch: Washington Post-ABC News Survey on Gun Control

To contact us Click HERE
Washington Post-ABC News Poll on Gun Control
 
Do you favor or oppose stricter gun control laws in this country?
  • Favor 54%
  • Oppose 43%
Would you support or oppose a law requiring a nationwide ban on: 

High-capacity ammunition clips, meaning those containing more than 10 bullets
  • Support 59%
  • Oppose 38%
Semi-automatic handguns, which automatically re-load every time the trigger is pulled
  • Support 52%
  • Oppose 44%
The sale of handguns, except to law enforcement officers
  • Support 27%
  • Oppose 71%
What do you think is the best way to reduce gun violence in this country - by passing stricter gun control laws, or by stricter enforcement of existing laws? 
  • Passing new laws 32%
  • Enforcing existing laws 49%
Thinking about the shooting at a Connecticut elementary school: Do you think this shooting reflects broader problems in American Society, or are things like this just the isolated acts of troubled individuals? 
  • Broader problems 52%
  • Isolated acts 43%
Survey of 602 adults was conducted December 14-16, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4.5 percentage points. 

Inside the numbers: 
Among groups, women are more apt to support stricter gun control than are men, by a 12-point margin, 59 vs. 47 percent; support for gun control is much higher in the Northeast and West than in the Midwest and South; and it’s far higher among nonwhites, 72 percent, than among whites, 48 percent.
Political and ideological differences, in particular, are stark: Stricter gun control overall is favored by 74 percent of Democrats but just 29 percent of Republicans; it’s 52 percent among independents, more than half for the first time since 2007. Support, similarly, is 72 percent among liberals and 58 percent among moderates, vs. 38 percent among conservatives.
As noted, however, these gaps narrow on the issue of banning high-capacity ammunition clips. Compared with their views on stricter gun control more generally, support for banning such clips jumps by 11 points among independents, by 16 points among Republicans and by 10 points among conservatives.
Intensity is on the side of supporters of stricter gun control in general – 44 percent of Americans are “strongly” in favor, vs. 32 percent strongly opposed, the widest intensity gap since spring 2007. And on banning high-capacity clips, strong supporters outnumber strong opponents by an 18-point margin, 47 percent vs. 29 percent.
At the same time, the highest intensity is in opposition to banning handguns overall – 56 percent “strongly” opposed, vs. 20 percent strong support.
People who see the Connecticut attack as a sign of broader societal problems are 11 points more apt to support stricter gun control than are those who see the crime as an isolated act, 59 vs. 48 percent. There are similar gaps in support for specific gun control measures; banning high-capacity clips, for instance, is favored by 65 percent of those who see a societal problem, vs. 52 percent of those who don’t.

Poll Watch: Fairleigh Dickinson PublicMind 2016 Presidential Survey

To contact us Click HERE
FDU PublicMind 2016 Presidential Poll Among Voters Who've Heard of Potential Presidential CandidateFavorable / Unfavorable {Net} 
  • Chris Christie 55% / 20% {+35%}
  • Marco Rubio 46% / 21% {+25%}
  • Bobby Jindal 45% / 28% {+17%}
  • Jeb Bush 32% / 30% {+2%}
  • Rick Santorum 31% / 37% {-6%}
Among Democrats
  • Chris Christie 52% / 22% {+30%}
  • Marco Rubio 20% / 41% {-21%}
  • Bobby Jindal 19% / 49% {-30%}
  • Jeb Bush 14% / 49% {-35%}
  • Rick Santorum 8% / 61% {-53%}
Among Republicans
  • Marco Rubio 74% / 5% {+69%}
  • Bobby Jindal 70% / 10% {+60%}
  • Jeb Bush 57% / 13% {+44%} 
  • Rick Santorum 58% / 16% {+42%}
  • Chris Christie 59% / 18% {+41%}
Among Independents
  • Chris Christie 57% / 19% {+38%}
  • Marco Rubio 36% / 20% {+16%}
  • Bobby Jindal 41% / 31% {+10%}
  • Jeb Bush 18% / 24% {-6%}
  • Rick Santorum 22% / 32% {-10%}
Among Men
  • Chris Christie 53% / 22% {+31%}
  • Marco Rubio 49% / 20% {+29%}
  • Bobby Jindal 47% / 27% {+20%}
  • Jeb Bush 32% / 32% {0%}
  • Rick Santorum 33% / 38% {-5%}
Among Women
  • Chris Christie 57% / 18% {+39%}
  • Marco Rubio 43% / 22% {+21%}
  • Bobby Jindal 44% / 28% {+16%}
  • Jeb Bush 32% / 28% {+4%}
  • Rick Santorum 29% / 37% {-8%}
National survey of 814 registered voters was conducted December 10-16, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 3.4 percentage points. Party ID: 34% Democrat; 26% Republican; 39% Independent; 1% Other.

Poll Watch: SurveyUSA Tampa-St. Petersburg Poll on Gun Control

To contact us Click HERE
SurveyUSA Tampa-St. Petersburg Poll on Gun Control

What do you think is more important -- to protect the right of Americans to own guns, or to control gun ownership?
  • Right to own 45%
  • Control ownership 49%
Among Democrats
  • Right to own 28%
  • Control ownership 67%
Among Republicans
  • Right to own 63%
  • Control ownership 33%
Among Independents
  • Right to own 46%
  • Control ownership 44%
Among Moderates
  • Right to own 34%
  • Control ownership 61%
Among Men
  • Right to own 53%
  • Control ownership 45%
Among Women
  • Right to own 38%
  • Control ownership 52%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Right to own 58%
  • Control ownership 36%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Right to own 32%
  • Control ownership 61%
Would you support or oppose a law requiring a nationwide ban on semi-automatic weapons, which automatically re-load every time the trigger is pulled? 
  • Support 50%
  • Oppose 42%
Among Democrats
  • Support 61%
  • Oppose 37%
Among Republicans
  • Support 39%
  • Oppose 51%
Among Independents
  • Support 51%
  • Oppose 36%
Among Moderates
  • Support 61%
  • Oppose 37%
Among Men
  • Support 47%
  • Oppose 49%
Among Women
  • Support 52%
  • Oppose 35%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 40%
  • Oppose 50%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 59%
  • Oppose 34%
Would you support or oppose a law that limits how much ammunition a gun can hold at once?
  • Support 59%
  • Oppose 31%
Among Democrats
  • Support 67%
  • Oppose 26%
Among Republicans
  • Support 48%
  • Oppose 44%
Among Independents
  • Support 63%
  • Oppose 24%
Among Moderates
  • Support 63%
  • Oppose 31%
Among Men
  • Support 53%
  • Oppose 40%
Among Women
  • Support 65%
  • Oppose 24%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 54%
  • Oppose 39%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 64%
  • Oppose 24%
Would you support or oppose a law that limits how much ammunition can be purchased at one time?  
  • Support 66%
  • Oppose 31%
Among Democrats
  • Support 75%
  • Oppose 23%
Among Republicans
  • Support 51%
  • Oppose 45%
Among Independents
  • Support 71%
  • Oppose 25%
Among Moderates
  • Support 73%
  • Oppose 26%
Among Men
  • Support 56%
  • Oppose 42%
Among Women
  • Support 74%
  • Oppose 21%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 55%
  • Oppose 40%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 76%
  • Oppose 22%
What do you think is the best way to reduce gun violence in this country: by passing stricter gun control laws, or by stricter enforcement of existing laws?  
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 38%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 56%
Among Democrats
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 47%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 48%
Among Republicans
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 29%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 69%
Among Independents
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 37%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 52%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 30%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 64%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 45%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 49%
Survey of 500 adults in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Sarasota area was conducted December 17, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4.5 percentage points. Party ID: 37% Democrat; 34% Republican; 27% Independent. Ideology: 42% Moderate; 32% Conservative; 14% Liberal.

Poll Watch: SurveyUSA San Diego Poll on Gun Control

To contact us Click HERE
SurveyUSA San Diego Poll on Gun Control

What do you think is more important -- to protect the right of Americans to own guns, or to control gun ownership?
  • Right to own 42%
  • Control ownership 52%
Among Democrats
  • Right to own 29%
  • Control ownership 67%
Among Republicans
  • Right to own 56%
  • Control ownership 37%
Among Independents
  • Right to own 42%
  • Control ownership 51%
Among Moderates
  • Right to own 31%
  • Control ownership 67%
Among Men
  • Right to own 50%
  • Control ownership 46%
Among Women
  • Right to own 34%
  • Control ownership 57%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Right to own 56%
  • Control ownership 39%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Right to own 34%
  • Control ownership 60%
Would you support or oppose a law requiring a nationwide ban on semi-automatic weapons, which automatically re-load every time the trigger is pulled? 
  • Support 59%
  • Oppose 34%
Among Democrats
  • Support 66%
  • Oppose 27%
Among Republicans
  • Support 60%
  • Oppose 34%
Among Independents
  • Support 53%
  • Oppose 40%
Among Moderates
  • Support 60%
  • Oppose 36%
Among Men
  • Support 55%
  • Oppose 41%
Among Women
  • Support 63%
  • Oppose 27%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 48%
  • Oppose 50%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 68%
  • Oppose 23%
Would you support or oppose a law that limits how much ammunition a gun can hold at once?
  • Support 62%
  • Oppose 29%
Among Democrats
  • Support 67%
  • Oppose 24%
Among Republicans
  • Support 59%
  • Oppose 33%
Among Independents
  • Support 60%
  • Oppose 31%
Among Moderates
  • Support 65%
  • Oppose 24%
Among Men
  • Support 62%
  • Oppose 33%
Among Women
  • Support 63%
  • Oppose 24%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 56%
  • Oppose 41%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 67%
  • Oppose 22%
Would you support or oppose a law that limits how much ammunition can be purchased at one time?  
  • Support 65%
  • Oppose 28%
Among Democrats
  • Support 76%
  • Oppose 23%
Among Republicans
  • Support 51%
  • Oppose 40%
Among Independents
  • Support 71%
  • Oppose 19%
Among Moderates
  • Support 74%
  • Oppose 21%
Among Men
  • Support 57%
  • Oppose 37%
Among Women
  • Support 73%
  • Oppose 18%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Support 60%
  • Oppose 38%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Support 71%
  • Oppose 20%
What do you think is the best way to reduce gun violence in this country: by passing stricter gun control laws, or by stricter enforcement of existing laws?  
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 44%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 47%
Among Democrats
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 52%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 38%
Among Republicans
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 38%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 58%
Among Independents
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 38%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 45%
Gun Owners (44%)
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 37%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 57%
Do Not Own a Gun (54%)
  • Passing stricter gun control laws 48%
  • Stricter enforcement of existing laws 41%
Survey of 500 adults in the San Diego area was conducted December 17, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4.5 percentage points. Party ID: 35% Democrat; 34% Republican; 28% Independent. Ideology: 37% Moderate; 32% Conservative; 20% Liberal.

2 Ocak 2013 Çarşamba

Poll Watch: Rasmussen (R) Survey on the School Shooting in Connecticut

To contact us Click HERE
Rasmussen (R) Poll on the Sandy Hook Shooting 

Does the United States need stricter gun control laws? 
  • Yes 47%
  • No 45%
Note: This is the highest level of support for more gun control ever measured by Rasmussen Reports. It’s two points higher than the support measured in April 2007 following the killings at Virginia Tech. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Democrats think the United States needs stricter gun control laws. Sixty-four percent (64%) of Republicans disagree. Unaffiliated adults are fairly evenly divided.

Does the United States need to take more action to identify and treat mental health issues? 
  • Yes 86%
  • No 7%
Does the United States need to place limits on violent movies and video games? 
  • Yes 49%
  • No 37%
  • Not sure 13%
Note: Most adults under 40 oppose limits on violent video games and movies. Most older adults are in favor of such limits. 
 
Can schools ever be made completely safe against violence like the incident in Connecticut? 
  • Yes 20%
  • No 64%
  • Not sure 15%
Note: That’s slightly more optimism than Americans felt in February following school shootings in an Ohio high school. Just 12% thought it was possible to make schools completely safe from such violence at that time. Last summer, only nine percent (9%) thought it was possible to make public spaces that safe following the shootings in a Colorado movie theater.
 
What will do the most to reduce the number of mass murders like the school shootings in Connecticut—stricter gun control laws, more action to treat mental health issues, or limits on violent movies and video games? 
  • More action to treat mental health issues 48%
  • Stricter gun control laws 27%
  • Limits on violent movies and video games 15%
  • Undecided 10%
Note: While 57% of Republicans and 54% of adults not affiliated with either major party think more action to treat mental health issues will do the most to prevent incidents like the one in Connecticut, a plurality (45%) of Democrats sees stricter gun control laws as the most effective approach. 

National survey of 1,000 adults was conducted December 17-18, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points.

Inside the numbers: 
Women are stronger advocates than men of more mental health treatment, stricter gun control and limits on violent movies and video games. Fifty-four percent (54%) of women favor tougher gun control laws; 54% of men are opposed.
Sixty-four percent (64%) of Americans who own a gun oppose stricter gun control laws. Sixty-one percent (61%) of those who say they don’t own a gun favor such laws.
Eighty-five percent (85%) of Americans have been following news stories about the recent shootings at an elementary school in Connecticut at least somewhat closely. This includes 51% who have been following very closely.

Poll Watch: Fairleigh Dickinson PublicMind Survey on Federal Funding for Hurricane Sandy

To contact us Click HERE
FDU PublicMind Poll on Federal Funding for Hurricane Sandy 

Some people think that the federal government should fund reconstruction from natural disasters like Hurricane Sandy, and worry about how to pay for it later. Others say that the federal government shouldn’t spend money it doesn’t have, even if there is a natural disaster. What comes closer to your view?
  • Fund 66%
  • Don't fund 23%
Among Democrats
  • Fund 77%
  • Don't fund 13%
Among Republicans
  • Fund 54%
  • Don't fund 36%
Among Independents
  • Fund 61%
  • Don't fund 24%
Among Men
  • Fund 61%
  • Don't fund 26%
Among Women
  • Fund 70%
  • Don't fund 21%
National survey of 814 registered voters was conducted December 10-16, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 3.4 percentage points. Party ID: 34% Democrat; 26% Republican; 39% Independent; 1% Other.

    Poll Watch: CNN/ORC Survey on Gun Rights

    To contact us Click HERE
    CNN/ORC Poll on Gun Rights 
      Please tell me whether you would generally favor or oppose each of the following proposals which some people have made to reduce the amount of gun violence: 

      A ban on the manufacture, sale and possession ofsemi-automatic assault guns, such as the AK-47 
      • Favor 62%
      • Oppose 37%
      Among Men
      • Favor 50%
      • Oppose 49%
      Among Women
      • Favor 74%
      • Oppose 25%
      A ban on the sale and possession of equipment knownas high-capacity or extended ammunition clips, whichallow some guns to shoot more than 10 bullets beforethey need to be reloaded
      • Favor 62%
      • Oppose 37%
      Among Men
      • Favor 53%
      • Oppose 46%
      Among Women
      • Favor 71%
      • Oppose 29%
      Limiting the number of guns an individual can own
      • Favor 48%
      • Oppose 52%
      Among Men
      • Favor 35%
      • Oppose 65%
      Among Women
      • Favor 61%
      • Oppose 39%
      Have the shootings in Connecticut made you more likely to support stricter gun control laws, lesslikely to support stricter gun control laws, or has your opinion on gun control not changed as aresult of the shootings in Connecticut? 
      • More likely 43% 
      • Less likely 7% 
      • No change 50%
      Among Men
      • More likely 35% 
      • Less likely 10% 
      • No change 55%
      Among Women
      • More likely 50% 
      • Less likely 4% 
      • No change 45%
      A background check on anyone attempting to purchasea gun in order to determine whether the prospectivebuyer has been convicted of a felony 
      • Favor 95%
      • Oppose 5%
      Preventing certain people, such as convicted felons orpeople with mental health problems, from owning guns 
      • Favor 92%
      • Oppose 8%
      Requiring gun owners to register their guns with thelocal government 
      • Favor 78%
      • Oppose 22%
      Which of the following statements comes closest to your view: 
      • There should be no restrictions on owning guns 13% 
      • There should be some restrictions on owning guns 71% 
      • All guns should be illegal for everyone except police and authorized personnel 15%
      Survey of 620 adults was conducted December 17-18, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4 percentage points. Party ID: 34% Democrat; 25% Republican; 41% Independent.

      Poll Watch: CNN/ORC 2016 Democratic Presidential Survey

      To contact us Click HERE
      CNN/ORC 2016 Democratic Presidential Poll 

      I'm going to read you the names of a few people who might run for the Democratic presidentialnomination in 2016. For each one, please tell me whether you would be very likely, somewhatlikely, not very likely, or not likely at all to support them if they decide to run for the Democraticnomination four years from now?

      Hillary Clinton
      • Very likely 65%
      • Somewhat likely 20%
      • Not very likely 8%
      • Not likely at all 6%
        Joe Biden
        • Very likely 26%
        • Somewhat likely 40%
        • Not very likely 21%
        • Not likely at all 13%
        Andrew Cuomo
        • Very likely 11%
        • Somewhat likely 45%
        • Not very likely 25%
        • Not likely at all 16%
        Elizabeth Warren
        • Very likely 16%
        • Somewhat likely 36%
        • Not very likely 26%
        • Not likely at all 14%
        Deval Patrick
        • Very likely 8%
        • Somewhat likely 33%
        • Not very likely 29%
        • Not likely at all 18%
        Brian Schweitzer
        • Very likely 10%
        • Somewhat likely 27%
        • Not very likely 32%
        • Not likely at all 18%
        National survey of 290 Democrats and Democratic-leaning Independents was conducted December 17-18, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 6 percentage points.

        Poll Watch: CNN/ORC 2016 Republican Presidential Survey

        To contact us Click HERE
        CNN/ORC 2016 GOP Presidential Poll 

        I'm going to read you the names of a few people who might run for the Republican presidentialnomination in 2016. For each one, please tell me whether you would be very likely, somewhatlikely, not very likely, or not likely at all to support them if they decide to run for the Republican nomination four years from now?

        Paul Ryan
        • Very likely 32%
        • Somewhat likely 43%
        • Not very likely 12%
        • Not likely at all 10%
        Chris Christie
        • Very likely 23%
        • Somewhat likely 36%
        • Not very likely 21%
        • Not likely at all 16%
        Marco Rubio
        • Very likely 28%
        • Somewhat likely 30%
        • Not very likely 17%
        • Not likely at all 16%
        Jeb Bush
        • Very likely 13%
        • Somewhat likely 38%
        • Not very likely 23%
        • Not likely at all 24%
        Rand Paul
        • Very likely 19%
        • Somewhat likely 29%
        • Not very likely 25%
        • Not likely at all 22%
        Rick Santorum
        • Very likely 10%
        • Somewhat likely 38%
        • Not very likely 28%
        • Not likely at all 21%
        National survey of 290 Republican and GOP-leaning Independents was conducted December 17-18, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 6 percentage points.

        1 Ocak 2013 Salı

        Executive Order: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

        To contact us Click HERE

        Tweet



        Join our Facebook page by clicking here!



        A PDF of the signed Executive Order document will be available as soon as it is published in the National Archives.

        Click here for the full list of President Obama's Executive Orders.
        Learn more about how other Presidents have used the Power of the Executive Order by clicking here.


        Executive Order: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 114(b) of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 (Public Law 112–175), which provides that any statutory adjustments to current levels in certain pay schedules for civilian Federal employees may take effect on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning after the date specified in section 106(3) of Public Law 112-175, it is hereby ordered as follows:     Section 1Statutory Pay Systems. The rates of basic pay or salaries of the statutory pay systems (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 5302(1)), as adjusted under 5 U.S.C. 5303, are set forth on the schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof:     (a) The General Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5332(a)) at Schedule 1;     (b) The Foreign Service Schedule (22 U.S.C. 3963) at Schedule 2; and     (c) The schedules for the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs (38 U.S.C. 7306, 7404; section 301(a) of Public Law 102-40) at Schedule 3.     Sec2Senior Executive Service. The ranges of rates of basic pay for senior executives in the Senior Executive Service, as established pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5382, are set forth on Schedule 4 attached hereto and made a part hereof.     Sec3Certain Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Salaries. The rates of basic pay or salaries for the following offices and positions are set forth on the schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof:     (a) The Executive Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5312–5318) at Schedule 5;     (b) The Vice President (3 U.S.C. 104) and the Congress (2 U.S.C. 31) at Schedule 6; and     (c) Justices and judges (28 U.S.C. 5, 44(d), 135, 252, and 461(a), and section 140 of Public Law 97–92) at Schedule 7.     Sec4Uniformed Services. The rates of monthly basic pay (37 U.S.C. 203(a)) for members of the uniformed services, as adjusted under 37 U.S.C. 1009, and the rate of monthly cadet or midshipman pay (37 U.S.C. 203(c)) are set forth on Schedule 8 attached hereto and made a part hereof.     Sec5Locality-Based Comparability Payments. (a) Pursuant to section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, and my authority to implement an alternative level of comparability payments under section 5304a of title 5, United States Code, locality-based comparability payments shall be paid in accordance with Schedule 9 attached hereto and made a part hereof.     (b) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall take such actions as may be necessary to implement these payments and to publish appropriate notice of such payments in the Federal Register.     Sec6Administrative Law Judges. Pursuant to section 5372 of title 5, United States Code, the rates of basic pay for administrative law judges are set forth on Schedule 10 attached hereto and made a part hereof.     Sec7Effective Dates. Schedule 8 is effective January 1, 2013. The other schedules contained herein are effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning after the date specified in section 106(3) of Public Law 112–175.     Sec8Prior Order Superseded. Executive Order 13594 of December 19, 2011, is superseded as of the effective dates specified in section 7 of this order.BARACK OBAMATHE WHITE HOUSE,December 27, 2012.


        585649_Join Zipcar and receive $25 in free driving with code GOZIP25 thru 11/8



        Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments! Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

        1461 is now being read by over 1,000,000 People and growing everyday! Help the 1461 continue to Grow and spread the truth - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS! Join our Facebook page by clicking here!

        Statement Regarding the Fiscal Cliff by President Obama

        To contact us Click HERE
        Tweet



        Join our Facebook page by clicking here!



        White House - James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

        December 28, 2012 @ 5:52 P.M. ESTTHE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. For the past couple of months, I’ve been working with leaders of both parties to try and forge an agreement that would grow our economy and shrink the deficit -- a balanced plan that would cut spending in a responsible way but also ask the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more, and, above all, protect our middle class and everybody who is striving to get into the middle class.I still want to get this done. It’s the right thing to do for our families, for our businesses, and for our entire economy. But the hour for immediate action is here.  It is now. We’re now at the point where, in just four days, every American’s tax rates are scheduled to go up by law. Every American’s paycheck will get considerably smaller.  And that would be the wrong thing to do for our economy, it would be bad for middle-class families, and it would be bad for businesses that depend on family spending. Fortunately, Congress can prevent it from happening if they act right now.I just had a good and constructive discussion here at the White House with Senate and House leadership about how to prevent this tax hike on the middle class, and I’m optimistic we may still be able to reach an agreement that can pass both houses in time. Senators Reid and McConnell are working on such an agreement as we speak.But if an agreement isn’t reached in time between Senator Reid and Senator McConnell, then I will urge Senator Reid to bring to the floor a basic package for an up-or-down vote –- one that protects the middle class from an income tax hike, extends the vital lifeline of unemployment insurance to two million Americans looking for a job, and lays the groundwork for future cooperation on more economic growth and deficit reduction. I believe such a proposal could pass both houses with bipartisan majorities as long as those leaders allow it to actually come to a vote.  If members of the House or the Senate want to vote no, they can –- but we should let everybody vote. That’s the way this is supposed to work.  If you can get a majority in the House and you can get a majority in the Senate, then we should be able to pass a bill. So the American people are watching what we do here. Obviously, their patience is already thin. This is déjà vu all over again. America wonders why it is that in this town, for some reason, you can't get stuff done in an organized timetable; why everything always has to wait until the last minute. Well, we're now at the last minute, and the American people are not going to have any patience for a politically self-inflicted wound to our economy. Not right now. The economy is growing, but sustaining that trend is going to require elected officials to do their jobs. The housing market is recovering, but that could be impacted if folks are seeing smaller paychecks. The unemployment rate is the lowest it’s been since 2008, but already you're seeing businesses and consumers starting to hold back because of the dysfunction that they see in Washington. Economists, business leaders all think that we’re poised to grow in 2013 –- as long as politics in Washington don’t get in the way of America’s progress. So we've got to get this done. I just want to repeat -- we had a constructive meeting today.  Senators Reid and McConnell are discussing a potential agreement where we can get a bipartisan bill out of the Senate, over to the House and done in a timely fashion so that we've met the December 31st deadline. But given how things have been working in this town, we always have to wait and see until it actually happens. The one thing that the American people should not have to wait and see is some sort of action.  So if we don’t see an agreement between the two leaders in the Senate, I expect a bill to go on the floor -- and I've asked Senator Reid to do this -- put a bill on the floor that makes sure that taxes on middle-class families don’t go up, that unemployment insurance is still available for two million people, and that lays the groundwork, then, for additional deficit reduction and economic growth steps that we can take in the New Year. But let's not miss this deadline.  That’s the bare minimum that we should be able to get done, and it shouldn’t be that hard since Democrats and Republicans both say they don’t want to see taxes go up on middle-class families. I just have to repeat -- outside of Washington, nobody understands how it is that this seems to be a repeat pattern over and over again.  Ordinary folks, they do their jobs. They meet deadlines. They sit down and they discuss things, and then things happen. If there are disagreements, they sort through the disagreements. The notion that our elected leadership can't do the same thing is mind-boggling to them. It needs to stop. So I'm modestly optimistic that an agreement can be achieved. Nobody is going to get 100 percent of what they want, but let's make sure that middle-class families and the American economy -- and, in fact, the world economy -- aren't adversely impacted because people can't do their jobs. Thank you very much, everybody.



        585649_Join Zipcar and receive $25 in free driving with code GOZIP25 thru 11/8



        Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments! Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

        1461 is now being read by over 1,000,000 People and growing everyday! Help the 1461 continue to Grow and spread the truth - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS!Join our Facebook page by clicking here!

        President Obama's Statement on the Ongoing Fiscal Cliff Negotiations

        To contact us Click HERE

        Tweet



        Join our Facebook page by clicking here!


        President Obama's Statement on the Ongoing Fiscal Cliff Negotiations


        South Court AuditoriumEisenhower Executive Office Building
        1:45 P.M. ESTTHE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Please, everybody have a seat.  Well, good afternoon, everybody.AUDIENCE:  Good afternoon! THE PRESIDENT:  Welcome to the White House.AUDIENCE:  Thank you!AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Thank you for having us.  (Laughter.) THE PRESIDENT:  Now, I realize that the last thing you want to hear on New Year's Eve is another speech from me.  But I do need to talk about the progress that’s being made in Congress today. For the last few days, leaders in both parties have been working toward an agreement that will prevent a middle class tax hike from hitting 98 percent of all Americans, starting tomorrow. Preventing that tax hike has been my top priority, because the last thing folks like the folks up here on this stage can afford right now is to pay an extra $2,000 in taxes next year.  Middle-class families can't afford it.  Businesses can't afford it.  Our economy can't afford it.Now, today it appears that an agreement to prevent this New Year's tax hike is within sight, but it's not done.  There are still issues left to resolve, but we're hopeful that Congress can get it done.  But it's not done.And so part of the reason that I wanted to speak to all of you here today is to make sure that we emphasize to Congress and that members of both parties understand that all across America, this is a pressing concern on people's minds. Now, the potential agreement that’s being talked about would not only make sure that taxes don’t go up on middle-class families, it also would extend tax credits for families with children.  It would extend our tuition tax credit that’s helped millions of families pay for college.  It would extend tax credits for clean energy companies that are creating jobs and reducing our dependence on foreign oil.  It would extend unemployment insurance to 2 million Americans who are out there still actively looking for a job. I have to say that ever since I took office, throughout the campaign, and over the last couple of months, my preference would have been to solve all these problems in the context of a larger agreement, a bigger deal, a grand bargain -- whatever you want to call it -- that solves our deficit problems in a balanced and responsible way, that doesn't just deal with the taxes but deals with the spending in a balanced way so that we can put all this behind us and just focusing on growing our economy. But with this Congress, that was obviously a little too much to hope for at this time.  (Laughter.)  It may be we can do it in stages.  We’re going to solve this problem instead in several steps.Last year in 2011, we started reducing the deficit through $1 trillion in spending cuts.  Those have already taken place.  The agreement being worked on right now would further reduce the deficit by asking the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans to pay higher taxes for the first time in two decades, so that would add additional hundreds of billions of dollars to deficit reduction. So that's progress, but we’re going to need to do more.Keep in mind that just last month Republicans in Congress said they would never agree to raise tax rates on the wealthiest Americans.  Obviously, the agreement that's currently being discussed would raise those rates and raise them permanently.  (Applause.)But keep in mind, we’re going to still have more work to do. We still have deficits that have to be dealt with.  We’re still going to have to think about how we put our economy on a long-term trajectory of growth, how we continue to make investments in things like education, things like infrastructure that help our economy grow. And keep in mind that the threat of tax hikes going up is only one part of this so-called fiscal cliff that everybody has been talking about.  What we also have facing us starting tomorrow are automatic spending cuts that are scheduled to go into effect.  And keep in mind that some of these spending cuts that Congress has said will automatically go into effect have an impact on our Defense Department, but they also have an impact on things like Head Start.  And so there are some programs that are scheduled to be cut that we’re using an axe instead of a scalpel -- may not always be the smartest cuts.  And so that is a piece of business that still has to be taken care of. And I want to make clear that any agreement we have to deal with these automatic spending cuts that are being threatened for next month, those also have to be balanced -- because remember, my principle has always been let’s do things in a balanced, responsible way.  And that means that revenues have to be part of the equation in turning off the sequester, in eliminating these automatic spending cuts, as well as spending cuts. Now, the same is true for any future deficit agreement.  Obviously, we’re going to have to do more to reduce our debt and our deficit.  I’m willing to do more, but it’s going to have to be balanced.  We’re going to have to do it in a balanced, responsible way.For example, I’m willing to reduce our government’s Medicare bills by finding new ways to reduce the cost of health care in this country.  That's something that we all should agree on.  We want to make sure that Medicare is there for future generations. But the current trajectory of health care costs is going up so high we've got to find ways to make sure that it’s sustainable. But that kind of reform has to go hand-in-hand with doing some more work to reform our tax code so that wealthy individuals, the biggest corporations can't take advantage of loopholes and deductions that aren't available to most of the folks standing up here -- aren't available to most Americans.  So there’s still more work to be done in the tax code to make it fairer, even as we're also looking at how we can strengthen something like Medicare.Now, if Republicans think that I will finish the job of deficit reduction through spending cuts alone -- and you hear that sometimes coming from them, that sort of after today we're just going to try to shove only spending cuts down -- well -- (laughter) -- shove spending cuts at us that will hurt seniors, or hurt students, or hurt middle-class families, without asking also equivalent sacrifice from millionaires or companies with a lot of lobbyists, et cetera -- if they think that's going to be the formula for how we solve this thing, then they’ve got another thing coming.  That's not how it’s going to work.  We've got to do this in a balanced and responsible way.  And if we're going to be serious about deficit reduction and debt reduction, then it’s going to have to be a matter of shared sacrifice -- at least as long as I'm President.  And I'm going to be President for the next four years, I think, so -- (applause.)So, anyway, for now, our most immediate priority is to stop taxes going up for middle-class families, starting tomorrow.  I think that is a modest goal that we can accomplish.  Democrats and Republicans in Congress have to get this done, but they’re not there yet.  They are close, but they’re not there yet.  And one thing we can count on with respect to this Congress is that if there’s even one second left before you have to do what you're supposed to do -- (laughter) -- they will use that last second.So, as of this point, it looks like I'm going to be spending New Year’s here in D.C.AUDIENCE:  Awww --THE PRESIDENT:  You all are going to be hanging out in D.C., too.  (Laughter.)  I can come to your house?  Is that what you said?  (Laughter.)  I don't want to spoil the party. AUDIENCE MEMBER:  You are the party.  (Laughter.)   THE PRESIDENT:  But the people who are with me here today, the people who are watching at home, they need our leaders in Congress to succeed.  They need us to all stay focused on them -- not on politics, not on special interests.  They need to be focused on families, students, grandmas, folks who are out there working really, really hard and are just looking for a fair shot and some reward for that hard work.They expect our leaders to succeed on their behalf.  So do I.  And so, keep the pressure on over the next 12 hours or so. Let’s see if we can get this thing done. And I thank you all.  And if I don't see you, if I don't show up at your house -- (laughter) -- I want to wish everybody a Happy New Year.  Thank you very much.  (Applause.)


        585649_Join Zipcar and receive $25 in free driving with code GOZIP25 thru 11/8



        Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments! Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

        1461 is now being read by over 1,000,000 People and growing everyday! Help the 1461 continue to Grow and spread the truth - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS! Join our Facebook page by clicking here!

        New Years Statement from the President on the Senate Deal to Extend Middle Class Tax Cuts

        To contact us Click HERE
        Tweet



        Join our Facebook page by clicking here!


        Statement from the President on the Senate Deal to Extend Middle Class Tax Cuts

        January 1, 2013

        Leaders from both parties in the Senate came together to reach an agreement that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support today that protects 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small business owners from a middle class tax hike.  While neither Democrats nor Republicans got everything they wanted, this agreement is the right thing to do for our country and the House should pass it without delay.This agreement will also grow the economy and shrink our deficits in a balanced way – by investing in our middle class, and by asking the wealthy to pay a little more.What's more, today's agreement builds on previous efforts to reduce our deficits. Last year, I worked with Democrats and Republicans to cut spending by more than $1 trillion. Tonight’s agreement does even more by asking millionaires and billionaires to begin to pay their fair share for the first time in twenty years.  As promised, that increase will be immediate, and it will be permanent.There’s more work to do to reduce our deficits, and I’m willing to do it. But tonight’s agreement ensures that, going forward, we will continue to reduce the deficit through a combination of new spending cuts and new revenues from the wealthiest Americans.  And as we address our ongoing fiscal challenges, I will continue to fight every day on behalf of the middle class and all those fighting to get into the middle class to forge an economy that grows from the middle out, not from the top down.



        585649_Join Zipcar and receive $25 in free driving with code GOZIP25 thru 11/8



        Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments! Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

        1461 is now being read by over 1,000,000 People and growing everyday! Help the 1461 continue to Grow and spread the truth - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS!Join our Facebook page by clicking here!

        Presidential Proclamation: 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation

        To contact us Click HERE

        Tweet



        Join our Facebook page by clicking here!



        Presidential Proclamation: 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation

        BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAA PROCLAMATIONOn December 31, 1862, our Nation marked the end of another year of civil war. At Shiloh and Seven Pines, Harpers Ferry and Antietam, brother had fought against brother. Sister had fought against sister. Blood and bitterness had deepened the divide that separated North from South, eroding the bonds of affection that once united 34 States under a single flag. Slavery still suspended the possibility of an America where life and liberty were the birthright of all, not the province of some.Yet, even in those dark days, light persisted. Hope endured. As the weariness of an old year gave way to the promise of a new one, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation -- courageously declaring that on January 1, 1863, "all persons held as slaves" in rebellious areas "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free." He opened the Union Army and Navy to African Americans, giving new strength to liberty's cause. And with that document, President Lincoln lent new moral force to the war by making it a fight not just to preserve, but also to empower. He sought to reunite our people not only in government, but also in freedom that knew no bounds of color or creed. Every battle became a battle for liberty itself. Every struggle became a struggle for equality.Our 16th President also understood that while each of us is entitled to our individual rights and responsibilities, there are certain things we cannot accomplish on our own. Only a Union could serve the hopes of every citizen, knocking down the barriers to opportunity and giving each of us the chance to pursue our highest aspirations. He knew that in these United States, no dream could ever be beyond our reach when we affirm that individual liberty is served, not negated, by seeking the common good.It is that spirit that made emancipation possible and codified it in our Constitution. It is that belief in what we can do together that moved millions to march for justice in the years that followed. And today, it is a legacy we choose not only to remember, but also to make our own. Let us begin this new year by renewing our bonds to one another and reinvesting in the work that lies ahead, confident that we can keep driving freedom's progress in our time.NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 1, 2013, as the 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that celebrate the Emancipation Proclamation and reaffirm the timeless principles it upheld.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.BARACK OBAMA



        585649_Join Zipcar and receive $25 in free driving with code GOZIP25 thru 11/8



        Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments! Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

        1461 is now being read by over 1,000,000 People and growing everyday! Help the 1461 continue to Grow and spread the truth - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS! Join our Facebook page by clicking here!